Legal Opinion
Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 1, 2014No. 2013-1585PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACH, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”) appeals the final judgment of the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) dismissing its action for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. See Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. United States, 918 F.Supp.2d 1376 (Ct.Int’l Trade 2013). Because Hartford has failed to plead sufficient factual matter to “state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face,” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678; 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), this court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Daniel A. Lindsay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Sioux Honey Ass'n v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hutchison Quality Furniture, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Wanxiang America Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Two Shields v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Dekatron Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- United States v. American Home Assurance Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.