Legal Opinion
Marvin Furniture (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 23, 2012No. Slip Op. 12-109; Court 12-00100PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge:
This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion for Judgment on the Agency Record filed herein by Plaintiff, Marvin Furniture (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. (“Marvin”). Marvin challenges the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) decision to rescind a new shipper review it had initiated of certain entries made by Marvin of wooden bedroom furniture. Marvin asserts that because it timely requested a new shipper review for which it was otherwise eligible, Commerce’s rescission was not supported by substantial evidence or in accord with the law. Defendant, United States and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corp. (30) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Haixing Jingmei Chemical Products Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Marvin Furniture (Shanghai) Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Marvin Furniture (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Qingdao Maycarrier Import & Export Corp., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Haixing Jingmei Chem. Prods. Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.