Legal Opinion

Donnelly v. Ætna Life Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1923No. Docket No. 59PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

On May 30, 1920, through the explosion of an acetylene tank, Mr. Donnelly, the plaintiff, sustained an injury which resulted in the loss of one of his eyes. He brings this suit to recover his loss. On the 29th of March, 1912, he took out an accident insurance policy in the ¿Etna Life-Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut. The policy was for one year and was renewed yearly, from time to time, until 1920, when Mr. Donnelly was informed by Raymond Visscher of Holland, one of defendant’s agents, that before issuing a renewal the company desired to have him take an examination. This Donnelly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Michigan Pipe Co. v. Michigan Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bowen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. KinneMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Connecticut General Life Ins. v. MullenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1912
  5. Strang v. Branch Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aetna Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. Licking Valley Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
  2. Stevens v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Von Crome v. Travelers' Ins. Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Jones v. Jackson National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API