Legal Opinion

Hetrick M. Huling v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 25, 1968No. 455-61PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLLINS, Judge. *

This is a civilian discharge pay case, which comes before us on the merits, the trial commissioner having submitted a report under Rule 67(c). In that same report, the commissioner also recommended rulings upon plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, motion to conform pleadings to proof, and motion to amend the complaint.

Plaintiff, a veterans preference eligible, was employed as a laborer, WB-3, Step 3, by the Department of the Air Force at the Air Force Flight Test Center, Edwards Air Force Base, California, from March 9, 1954, to December 3, 1956.

On October 29,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jerome J. Pine v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Hannington v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Joseph J. Holman, Jr. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. DeBusk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  5. Walker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  2. Louis G. Ruderer v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. Baskett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. Laningham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  5. Laningham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API