Legal Opinion
Laningham v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 31, 1983No. 109-81CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON CROSS-MOTIONS OF THE PARTIES FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GIBSON, Judge:
This is a military pay case premised on 28 U.S.C. § 1491. Plaintiff, a Lieutenant Commander in the United States Naval Reserve, seeks certain disability pay and allowances 1 and various other monetary and equitable relief, alleged to be due him as a result of an injury sustained in an automobile accident on June 9,1978, while serving on active duty for training. Plaintiff demands all such pay and allowances in arrears from the date of his injury to the present, with a set-off for all of the disability pay and allowances…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- YRT Services Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Doty v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Laningham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Laningham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.