Laningham v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:
INTRODUCTION
This docketed military pay case is the continuation of a protracted saga relating to disability entitlements of an officer in the United States Naval Reserve.1 Two previous opinions have issued under docket no. 109-81C, dated May 31, 1983, and April 13, 1984, which provided certain relief (disability pay and allowances) to plaintiff pursuant to a Notice of Eligibility (NOE). The former opinion(s) held and directed that:... plaintiff shall continue to be paid such disability pay and allowances until the same is properly terminated pursuant to…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Milas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- CCL Service Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Gallucci v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Christian v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Sharpe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.