In Re McAllister
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Respondent contends the district court did not have jurisdiction over the juvenile to enter the several orders involved in this proceeding.
With commendable candor the Attorney General states:
“It appears that the court was without jurisdiction over the subject juvenile and its orders, therefore, void.”
“Juvenile proceedings in this State are not criminal prosecutions and a finding of delinquency in a juvenile proceeding is not synonymous with the conviction of a crime. Nevertheless, a juvenile cited under a petition to appear for an inquiry into his alleged delinquency is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- In Re AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- In Re AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- In Re JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re LeggettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- In Re PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- In Re PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002