In Re Alexander
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParrer, J.
The order appealed from is based on a finding that respondent is a delinquent “in that he did commit larceny by taking one portable record player from S. H. Kress & Co.” The evidence presented was insufficient to support this finding.
While juvenile proceedings should not be equated to criminal prosecutions nor should a finding of delinquency in such a proceeding be deemed synonymous with conviction of a crime. In re Burrus, 275 N.C. 517, 169 S.E. 2d 879, nevertheless certain constitutional safeguards apply. In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 25 L. Ed. 2d 368, 90 S. Ct. 1068; In re Gault, 387 U.S.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by12 opinions
- Matter of VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- In re T.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- In Re NBCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- In re N.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- In Re JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.