Legal Opinion

In Re Alexander

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 24, 1970No. 7021DC243PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParrer, J.

The order appealed from is based on a finding that respondent is a delinquent “in that he did commit larceny by taking one portable record player from S. H. Kress & Co.” The evidence presented was insufficient to support this finding.

While juvenile proceedings should not be equated to criminal prosecutions nor should a finding of delinquency in such a proceeding be deemed synonymous with conviction of a crime. In re Burrus, 275 N.C. 517, 169 S.E. 2d 879, nevertheless certain constitutional safeguards apply. In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 25 L. Ed. 2d 368, 90 S. Ct. 1068; In re Gault, 387 U.S.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. In re T.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. In Re NBCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. In re N.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. In Re JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API