Legal Opinion

In Re Alexander

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 24, 1970No. 7027DC204PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.

In a prosecution for subornation of perjury, the falsity of the oath of the alleged perjurer must be established by the testimony of two witnesses, or one witness and corroborating circumstances, sometimes called adminicular circumstances. State v. King, 267 N.C. 631, 148 S.E. 2d 647; State v. Allen, 260 N.C. 220, 132 S.E. 2d 302; State v. Lucas, 247 N.C. 208, 100 S.E. 2d 366; State v. Sailor, 240 N.C. 113, 81 S.E. 2d 191. The State contends that the above requirement was met in that two witnesses, a police officer and the court family counselor, testified over objection that each of them…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. SailorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. In re T.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. In Re NBCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. In re N.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. In Re JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API