Legal Opinion

Huffaker v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 1, 1969No. 44432PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Debn, Judge.

1. Our Constitution (Art. I, Sec. I, Par. V; Code Ann. § 2-105) requires that every person charged with crime shall on demand made previously to arraignment be furnished with a list of the State’s witnesses. The requirement is mandatory, and it is error to permit a witness whose name was not on the list furnished to testify unless “the solicitor or prosecuting attorney shall state in his place that the evidence sought to be presented is newly-discovered evidence which the State was not aware of at the time of its furnishing the defendant with a list of the witnesses.” Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. TalkingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. Flahive v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sharplin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Watkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Muhammad v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. Bruce E. Ellis v. Amos E. Reed, Secretary of Corrections, and the Attorney General of the State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API