Legal Opinion

United States v. Edmonds

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 15, 1994No. Crim. 90-393-04 (CRR)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, along with the Defendant’s First, Second, and Third Supplemental Memoranda in Support thereof. 1 The Defendant, through counsel, raises two claims which he asserts entitle him to relief from his conviction: (1) that the prosecution violated his right to due process by presenting perjured testimony; and (2) that the statutory provision under which the Defendant was convicted and sentenced, 21 U.S.C. § 841(b), must be struck…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. United States v. Rodger EdmondsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Restrepo-SuaresDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API