United States v. Edmonds
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, along with the Defendant’s First, Second, and Third Supplemental Memoranda in Support thereof. 1 The Defendant, through counsel, raises two claims which he asserts entitle him to relief from his conviction: (1) that the prosecution violated his right to due process by presenting perjured testimony; and (2) that the statutory provision under which the Defendant was convicted and sentenced, 21 U.S.C. § 841(b), must be struck…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- United States v. Rodger EdmondsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Restrepo-SuaresDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010