United States v. Rodger Edmonds
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Defendant Edmonds appeals his narcotics convictions. He argues for reversal because “other crimes” evidence and other testimony was, he alleges, erroneously admitted. He also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence as well as the constitutionality of one of the statutes he was convicted of violating. We affirm.
I. Facts
In the early evening of August 29, 1990 Rodger Edmonds and Anthony Morse were sitting in a car near Union Station in the District of Columbia. At the same time, Julius Harrison and Gary Davis, a Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) special agent who was working undercover, met at…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Antoine D. Washington, United States of America v. Glen Early, Jr., A/K/A William Kevin MarcusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Alfonso Lopez, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Keith McGillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Thompson, Michael D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Boone v. Barnes (In Re Barnes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Earle, JamesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Earle, JamesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.