Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Hooten Construction Co. v. Borsberry Construction Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1989No. 17711PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOSA, Chief Justice.
In accordance with the provisions set forth in our Uniform Arbitration Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 44-7-1 through -22, Borsberry Construction Company, a general contractor, appeals the order of confirmation of an arbitration award in favor of the subcontractor, Hooten Construction Company, and judgment entered thereon. Implicit in the appeal is a claim of error in the denial by the district court of Borsberry’s application to vacate, modify, or correct the award filed pursuant to Sections 44-7-12 and -13.
In July 1986, Borsberry contracted with the State for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- John M. Foster, Cross-Appellant v. C.F. Turley, Jr., A/K/A Frank Turley, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Three Rivers Land Co., Inc. v. MaddouxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Universal Life Church v. CoxonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
- O'MEARA v. Commercial Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Fernandez v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Arnold v. Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- McMillan v. Allstate Indemnity Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- United Technology & Resources, Inc. v. Dar Al IslamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.