Arnold v. Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Justice.
We accepted this application for review, filed by Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. and D. Stanley Shelton pursuant to Term. R.App.P. 11, in order to clarify the standard under which a final decision rendered by an arbitration panel may be judicially reviewed. We find that under the facts and circumstances here present, the review conducted by the Court of Appeals was unduly extensive; we reverse the judgment and reinstate the order of the trial court upholding the ruling of the arbitration panel.
I
The record reveals that upon the death of her father in 1981, Rosalind Arnold, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Swift Industries, Inc., in No. 71-1420 v. Botany Industries, Inc., in No. 71-1421Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Edward R. Bettencourt v. Boston Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Boyd v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- D & E Construction Co. v. Robert J. Denley Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Lawrence County Education Ass'n v. Lawrence County Board of EducationTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. v. William Hamilton Smythe, IIITennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Team Design v. GottliebCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Pugh's Lawn Landscape Co. v. Jaycon Development Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.