Legal Opinion
United Technology & Resources, Inc. v. Dar Al Islam
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 1993No. 20312PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MONTGOMERY, Justice.
United Technology and Resources, Inc. (“U.T.R.”), plaintiff below, appeals from a judgment of the district court confirming an arbitration award in its favor. The award provided that U.T.R. should recover from defendants, Dar Al Islam and Crescent Leasing & Development Corporation (collectively, “Crescent”), the entire amount of compensatory damages sought by U.T.R. for Crescent’s breach of a construction contract, plus costs of the arbitration, but denied U.T.R.’s request for attorney’s fees and recommended that no punitive damages be assessed in U.T.R.’s favor.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Florasynth, Inc. v. Alfred PickholzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Nationwide General Insurance v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local Union No. 135 v. Jefferson Trucking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Taylor v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Service Employees International Union, Local No. 36, Afl-Cio v. Office Center Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Fernandez v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Cody Farms, Inc. v. Deerman (In re Deerman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Aguilera v. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Duchscher v. VaileMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Laurich v. Red Lobster Rests., LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.