Legal Opinion

Giesy v. Aurora State Bank

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1927PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbown, J.

Does the decree rendered in appellant’s foreclosure suit — case number 17607 — constitute an estoppel by judgment against the plaintiff in this suit? This is the question involved herein. There appears to be no question concerning the facts. The unpaid promissory notes, made and delivered to the plaintiff, and the trust deed given to secure their payment, were made in good faith and for a valuable consideration, and that deed was duly recorded in the mortgage records of Marion County. About a month after the execution and recordation of the deed, Eobert Krims and Marie N. Krims, Ms wife, for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strobe v. DownerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Gregory v. Suburban Realty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Barnes v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Burns v. ShollNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Duffield v. City of DetriotMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hansen v. GaligerMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Chandler & Newville, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Grebe v. RohrerOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Lincoln Loan Co. v. Estate of George GeppertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API