Legal Opinion

Grebe v. Rohrer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Suit by Jacob E. Grebe against G.G. Rohrer and wife and F.S. Crynes and wife. From a decree for plaintiff, F.S. Crynes and wife appeal.

AFFIRMED. The defendants F.S. Crynes and Effie Crynes claim error in regard to the court sustaining the allegation as to the interest of defendants F.S. Crynes and Effie Crynes in said mortgaged premises, referred to above. This allegation was sufficient to bar the interest of a subsequent lienholder, if unanswered, and it was not incumbent upon the plaintiff to set out all the facts in regard thereto. This was a matter that was particularly within the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gray v. PeltonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Samuels v. MacK-international Motor Truck Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Turnbow v. KellerOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Giesy v. Aurora State BankOregon Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mountain View Rural Telephone Co. v. Interstate Telephone Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Leighton v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Grebe v. RohrerOregon Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API