Pendexter v. Tilcon of Maine, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] Barry Pendexter appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board granting, in part, his petition for restoration. The issue in this appeal is whether the workers’ compensation retiree presumption applies to an employee who returns to work after an initial period of retirement. 39-A M.R.S.A. § 223 (Supp.1998). We affirm.
[¶2] Pendexter suffered a work-related low back and left leg injury on October 16, 1985, while employed by Tilcon as a road paving foreman and received short-term incapacity benefits until February 1986. His employment at Tilcon involved a seasonal hiatus…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frasier v. Model Coverall Service, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Bowie v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Peck v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Dezwaan v. Holland Motor ExpressMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Miles v. Russell Memorial HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Damon v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Costales v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Downing v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012