Bowie v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
The employee, William Bowie, appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying his petition for review based on his failure to rebut the presumption set forth in 39-A M.R.S.A. § 223 (Supp.1994-95). Bowie contends that the presumption does not apply to him because he was receiving benefits at the time of his retirement, he was employed at light duty status and his retirement was involuntary. Bowie also argues that even if section 223 applies, he successfully rebutted the presumption. Because we conclude that the hearing officer correctly relied on the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Frasier v. Model Coverall Service, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- White v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Ibbitson v. Sheridan Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Ray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mathieu v. Bath Iron WorksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Guiggey v. Great Northern Paper, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Ray v. Carland Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Damon v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Temm v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.