Legal Opinion
Peck v. General Motors Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided December 7, 1987No. Docket 85239, 87825PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtR. A. Benson, J.
These two cases have been consolidated for appeal. In Peck v General Motors Corp, the plaintiff was granted leave to appeal from a determination by the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board that he did not meet the new burden in proving disability placed on him by MCL 418.373; MSA 17.237(373). In Pankow v General Motors Corp, the defendant, General Motors Corporation, was granted leave to appeal from a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board that allowed plaintiff to recover by denying retroactive effect to MCL 418.373; MSA 17.237(373).
STATEMENT OF FACTS: PECK v GENERAL MOTORS CORP
On…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Certified QuestionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vogel v. Wells Fargo Guard ServicesTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Tobin's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Bowie v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Miles v. Russell Memorial HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Wright v. Vos Steel Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.