Legal Opinion
Lubeck v. Comet Die and Engraving Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 28, 1994No. 93 C 544PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Robert Lubeck (“Lubeck”) has sued Comet Die and Engraving Company (“Comet”), claiming that it discharged him because of his age (65 at the time of his dismissal) in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634. Comet has moved for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, Comet’s motion is granted and this action is dismissed with prejudice.
Summary Judgment Standards
Familiar Rule 56 principles impose on the movant the burden of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goodman v. Heitman Financial ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Feeley v. Bank of WaukeganDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Pistolis v. AmerenDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023
- Pistolis v. JF ElectricDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023