Legal Opinion
Goodman v. Heitman Financial Services
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 10, 1995No. 94 C 4381PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Alvin Goodman (“Goodman”) brings this two-count action against Heitman Financial, Ltd. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Heitman Financial Services (collectively “Heitman,” treated as a singular noun), alleging age discrimination (Count I) and retaliation (Count II) in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA,” 29 U.S.C. §§ 623(a) and 623(d)). 1 Goodman has moved for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56, 2 both sides have complied with this District Court’s General Rule (“GR”) 12(m) and 12(n) 3 and the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Damato v. Jack Phelan Chevrolet Geo, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Lumpkin v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995