Legal Opinion

People v. Russo

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2001No. S088368PublishedCited by 206 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In California, a conviction for conspiracy requires proof that at least one of the conspirators committed an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. We granted review to decide whether the jury must unanimously agree on a specific overt act. We conclude the jury need not agree on a specific overt act as long as it unanimously finds beyond a reasonable doubt that some conspirator committed an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.

I. Factual and Procedural History

On the night of July 14, 1994 (all dates are to the year 1994), a Fresno County deputy sheriff found David…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. PrideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by206 opinions

  1. People v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. TullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. JuradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API