Martin v. Martin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County granting a new trial. Ansel Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Within one year after the last will of the decedent had been admitted to probate, the appellant filed his petition for the revocation of the probate. Upon issues made by the answer of the respondents the cause was tried before a jury, who found upon certain special issues submitted to them in accordance with the petition, and thereupon the court made its order revoking the probate. Respondents thereupon moved for a new trial, which was granted, and the petitioner has appealed from the order. One of the grounds upon which the motion was made is the insufficiency of the evidence to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Domico v. CasassaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Borkheim v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Finkle v. TaitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Morgan v. J. W. Robinson Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Hitchcock v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Otten v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.