Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1990No. S010191PublishedCited by 332 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.—

I. Introduction

In this child molestation case, we are presented with dilficult questions regarding the extent to which the defendant’s due process rights are implicated by the inability of his young accuser to give specific details regarding the time, place and circumstances of various alleged assaults. Frequently, as here, these cases involve the so-called “resident child molester” (see People v. Van Hoek (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 811, 814, & fn. 1 [246 Cal.Rptr. 352]), who either lives with his victim or has continuous access to him or her. In such cases, the victim…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by332 opinions

  1. People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

327 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API