Legal Opinion
Halpin v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 20, 1971No. 12594, 12606PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PIERCE, P. J.
We issued an order to show cause and a stay order on the two above-captioned petitions for mandamus and/or prohibition. The Halpin-Giles petition represents interests antipodal to the Hyster Company (“Hyster”) petition but the aim of both was to stay further proceedings in an action pending in the Superior Court of Sacramento County, No. 192553 (“Sacramento action”) entitled Douglas Guardian Warehouse (“Warehouse”) v. Jack Halpin and Max G. Giles.
The two proceedings have been consolidated. The declared purpose of the Sacramento action was to compel specific performance of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gorman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Myers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Thornton v. LuceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Cade v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- River Garden Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Stambaugh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Franklin & Franklin v. 7-Eleven Owners for Fair FranchisingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Jhaveri v. TeitelbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People Ex Rel. Garamendi v. American Autoplan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.