Thornton v. Luce
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
Although there are numerous parties and somewhat complex factual situations presented herein for our review, the legal issues are few and relatively clear. Two actions stemming from the same multi-party traffic accident were consolidated for purposes of trial. We shall refer to them as the “Shaw” case and the “Thornton” case.
Appellants Martha Jean Luce and Richard B. Luce, who were named as defendants in both cases and were the only defendants named in the Shaw case, appeal from the consolidated judgment and particularly specify that their appeal is from the “judgments” contained therein in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Stewart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Richardson v. HamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Alisal Sanitary District v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Touchard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- River Garden Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Stambaugh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.