Legal Opinion
Cade v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 1961No. Civ. 6683PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.
Petitioner seeks to prohibit the respondent court from proceeding with an action on file in San Bernardino County on the grounds that the Superior Court of Los Angeles County first acquired exclusive jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action by reason of an earlier action filed therein. Service of summons in the Los Angeles action was obtained before service in the San Bernardino action.
A brief chronological outline of the proceedings in this matter is as follows -. Petitioner Cade filed an action in Los Angeles County on June 6, 1960, and served Loyalty Loan and Investment Company,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Rogers v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Fritts v. CampCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rynsburger v. Dairymen's Fertilizer Cooperative, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Childs v. EltingeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People Ex Rel. Garamendi v. American Autoplan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Halpin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.