Legal Opinion

Franklin & Franklin v. 7-Eleven Owners for Fair Franchising

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 2000No. A085722PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SEPULVEDA, J.

Appellants, several lawyers and law firms, appeal from an injunction entered by the Alameda Superior Court restraining them from prosecuting two civil actions for damages and declaratory relief filed in the San Diego Superior Court. The San Diego proceedings arose out of class action litigation that had been pending before the Alameda Superior Court for over four years and, at the time the injunction issued, was (and is) pending in this court on appeal from a judgment approving the settlement of the class action and an award of $4.7-5 million in attorneys’ fees to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Producers Dairy Delivery Co. v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Sandoval v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Betz v. PankowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Rynsburger v. Dairymen's Fertilizer Cooperative, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kay v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. I.K. Ex Rel. E.K. v. Sylvan Union School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  3. Raymond Richardson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.ACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  4. Cesar Moreno v. Utiliquest, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  5. Manco Contracting Co.(WLL) v. BezdikianCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API