Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. Coccadotts, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 14, 2015Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard M. Platkin, J.
Matthew J. O’Connor is a 49% shareholder in the three business corporations named as respondents/defendants in this hybrid proceeding/action: Coccadotts, Inc., Coccadotts Express, Inc. and Panaji, Inc. (collectively Coccadotts entities). His verified petition and complaint alleges five causes of action: (1) dissolution of the Coccadotts entities pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1104-a; (2) provisional relief under Business Corporation Law § 1115; (3) breach of fiduciary duty by respondents/defendants Rachel Dott and Lucas Dott (collectively the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Seagroatt Floral Co. Inc.(riccardi)New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Ferolito v. VultaggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Smith v. RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Chu v. Sino Chemists, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Dissolution of Elliot Kastle, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996