Matter of Seagroatt Floral Co. Inc.(riccardi)
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kaye, J.
In this appeal by two closely held corporations — Seagroatt Floral Company and Henry J. Seagroatt Company — we are called upon to answer two questions. First, was the lack of a public market for the corporations’ shares taken into account in valuing the companies for purposes of buying out petitioners’ minority stockholdings under Business Corporation Law § 1118, and second, was it error to impose joint and several liability on the two corporations. We conclude that, while lack of marketability was considered in valuing the stock, the imposition of joint and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Port Chester Electrical Construction Corp. v. AtlasNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Ravo v. RogatnickNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Humphrey v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Balsamides v. Protameen Chemicals, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Rodick v. City of SchenectadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Rodick v. City of SchenectadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Friedman v. Beway Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- 24/7 Records, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.