Legal Opinion
Pugh v. Akron-Chicago Transportation Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 3, 1940No. 28113PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.
The defendant’s assignments of error are numerous. However, a study of the record and the opinion of the Court of Appeals discloses a complete answer to each complaint.
The only question requiring comment -by this court is that relating to Section 6310-27, General Code, which reads as follows:
“No vehicle shall stop on any road-or highway, except with front and rear right wheels within one foot of the right hand side of the improved portion of the road, nor in any such way as to obstruct a free passage of the road; provided that nothing in this section shall be held to apply whenever a driver…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
- Kormos v. Cleveland Retail Credit Men's Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
- Skinner v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
- Gumley, Admr. v. CowmanOhio Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by5 opinions
- Price v. McCoy Sales & Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
- D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. Margaret H. Slingland, United States of America v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Pieper Ex Rel. Pieper v. HarmeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Sheridan v. WerkheiserOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
- Zawlocki v. HoutzOhio Court of Appeals · 1974