Legal Opinion

Zawlocki v. Houtz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1974No. 13-73-13PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGuernsey, P. J.

The basic facts of the incident from which this appeal has arisen are that defendant Houtz, while delivering a newspaper, stopped her car in front of plaintiff, and that plantiff while stopping his car behind her received injuries when a third car in the same lane of traffic collided with the rear end of plaintiff’s car, the third car then colliding with a car traveling in the opposite direction in the opposing lane of traffic. Plaintiff sued defendant Houtz on the theory that she was negligent in stopping in the manner which she did, that her negligence concurred with the negligence of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ornella v. RobertsonOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bird v. HartOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Lester v. John R. Jurgensen Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  4. Pugh v. Akron-Chicago Transportation Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Pugh v. Akron-Chicago Transportation Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. Royal Paper Stock Co., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API