Legal Opinion

Gumley, Admr. v. Cowman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1934No. 24914PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

The lower courts were agreed that on the single question as to the negligence of the defendant there was evidence requiring submission to the jury. The basis for this view was the testimony of several witnesses to the effect that the light on the rear of the truck was not burning. They also quoted the defendant, Cowman, as admitting that he had stopped because the rear light was out of repair. This was denied by the defendant who insisted that he had stopped for the purpose of inspecting his load.

However, on the question of contributory negligence the lower courts held that the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Lindquist v. ThiermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Smiley v. Arrow Spring Bed Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Kormos v. Cleveland Retail Credit Men's Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Williams v. PowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API