Sheridan v. Werkheiser
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.
This is an appeal on questions of lav/. The alleged errors arise by reason of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the second amended petition. The sustained demurrer set forth the single ground that the second amended petition did not state a cause of action against the defendant Dwight E. Werkheiser.
In the second amended petition two defendants, appellees, are named as concurrent joint tort-feasors.
The plaintiff, appellant, consummated a settlement with the defendant Frederick M. Hart, which settlement provided for reservation of all the rights to the plaintiff as against the defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ash v. MortensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Wery v. SeffOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Larson v. Cleveland Railway Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
- Cleveland Ry. Co. v. NickelOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Betras v. G. M. McKelvey Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Helen Anderson and William M. Anderson v. Hudspeth Pine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962