Legal Opinion

Sheridan v. Werkheiser

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1950No. 520PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.

This is an appeal on questions of lav/. The alleged errors arise by reason of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the second amended petition. The sustained demurrer set forth the single ground that the second amended petition did not state a cause of action against the defendant Dwight E. Werkheiser.

In the second amended petition two defendants, appellees, are named as concurrent joint tort-feasors.

The plaintiff, appellant, consummated a settlement with the defendant Frederick M. Hart, which settlement provided for reservation of all the rights to the plaintiff as against the defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ash v. MortensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Wery v. SeffOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Larson v. Cleveland Railway Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. NickelOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Betras v. G. M. McKelvey Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Helen Anderson and William M. Anderson v. Hudspeth Pine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API