Legal Opinion

Madison Services, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 23, 2010No. 09-675 CPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BLOCK, Judge.

As the once-presumptive awardee in a now-cancelled negotiated procurement by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”), plaintiff, Madison Services, Inc. (“Madison”), challenges the agency’s cancellation decision. For the reasons set forth below, the court finds FEMA’s cancellation of the procurement to be founded upon a reasonable basis, adequately documented in the administrative record, thus placing the decision squarely within the agency’s discretion. Accordingly, the court denies the protest.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A sinuous path has led…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. PlanetSpace Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. MORI Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Allied Technology Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  5. Pitney Bowes Government Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API