Temple v. Dooley
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Marshall Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. W. W. Haralson. Attachment by L. P. Dooley against T. T. Temple to enforce a landlord’s lien for rent. The court directed a verdict for plaintiff on trial of defendant’s plea in abatement, and defendant appeals. Transferred from Court of Appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The questions presented in the assignment of errors arose in the trial of an attachment, sued out by a landlord against his tenant, to recover an amount due for rent and advances. The ground for the attachment was that the defendant-tenant had removed from the premises a part of the crop raised on the rented premises, without paying the rent and advances, or either, and without the consent of the landlord. Defendant interposed a plea in abatement, that the alleged ground for the attachment did not exist. At plaintiff’s request, the court gave the affirmative charge on trial of defendant’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gunter v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Meyers v. MartinezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Stoutz v. HugerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- May v. Courtnay, Tennant & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1872
- Stanton v. HeardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vacalis v. LowrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Hurt v. KnoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Hardeman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Heffelfinger v. LaneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- First Nat. Bank of Russellville v. WelchAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.