Stanton v. Heard
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Butler. Tried before the Hon. John P. Hubbard.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.
These two cases are dependent on the same state of facts, record and otherwise. We will consider them together.
Geo. P. Heard had been engaged in selling merchandise, having a stock of goods on hand. On January 5,1891, he conveyed his said stock of merchandise to W. L. Tillman. This conveyance was in form an absolute sale.
On January 10, 1891, Murray, Dibrell & Co. and O’Bryan Bros, filed a bill in chancery against Heard and Tillman, in which they set forth that they severally were creditors of said Heard before January 5, 1891, and that their said demands were still unpaid. It was charged in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wiswall v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Dollins & Co. v. Lindsey & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Heard v. Murray, Dibbrell & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Dugger v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Bray & Bros. v. LairdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Strother v. McCordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Hamilton v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Fleming v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Lewman & Co. v. Ogden Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Temple v. DooleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.