Hardeman v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Certiorari to Court of Appeals. Bob Hardeman was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree. The judgment was reversed and the case remanded (81 South. 449) and the State petitions for certiorari.
1Per curiam
[1] We have examined the petition for certiorari and are of the opinion the writ be, and it is hereby, denied. We wish- to say that the judgment entered in the lower eonrt in the case of State v. Bob Hardeman was sufficient to support an appeal. A consideration of such judgments will be found in Talbert v. State, 140 Ala. 96, 99, 37 South. 78, where Mr. Justice Dowdell said:
“There is an omission in the minute entry of the judgment of a formal adjudication of the defendant’s guilt upon the verdict rendered. The minute entry, however, shows a judgment of sentence by the court in accordance with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Driggers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Wilkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Ex parte RobersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Gray v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Gunter v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Carmichael v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Hines v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Durden v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Milam v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
- Watson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.