Hurt v. Knox
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
(after stating the facts as above). [1,2] It has been repeatedly ruled here that the jurisdiction conferred upon law courts by the statute, section 9521 of the Code, authorizing a rehearing and requiring the application ’ to be made within four months from the rendition of the judgment, is statutory and limited; that such proceeding is not a continuation of the proceeding in the original case, but is the commencement of a new action. Evans v. Wilhite, et al., 167 Ala. 587, 52 So. 845; Renfro Bros. v. Merryman & Co., 71 Ala. 196; Martin v. Hudson, 52 Ala. 279; Ex parte Johnson & Seats, 60 Ala.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Barnewall v. MurrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Evans v. WilhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Spooney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Wilmerding v. Corbin Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Ex Parte GaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cobbs v. NorvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Ex Parte PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Palmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- University of Alabama Hospitals v. Warren (In Re Warren)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1980
- Venable v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.