Legal Opinion

Hurt v. Knox

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 23, 1930No. 1 Div. 536PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

(after stating the facts as above). [1,2] It has been repeatedly ruled here that the jurisdiction conferred upon law courts by the statute, section 9521 of the Code, authorizing a rehearing and requiring the application ’ to be made within four months from the rendition of the judgment, is statutory and limited; that such proceeding is not a continuation of the proceeding in the original case, but is the commencement of a new action. Evans v. Wilhite, et al., 167 Ala. 587, 52 So. 845; Renfro Bros. v. Merryman & Co., 71 Ala. 196; Martin v. Hudson, 52 Ala. 279; Ex parte Johnson & Seats, 60 Ala.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Barnewall v. MurrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Evans v. WilhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Spooney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Wilmerding v. Corbin Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  5. Ex Parte GaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. NorvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Ex Parte PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Palmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  4. University of Alabama Hospitals v. Warren (In Re Warren)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1980
  5. Venable v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API