Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Jackson
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1976No. Docket Nos. 55100-55105, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
Claim of Bania
This is one of a series of test cases in which the Court interprets from varied factual situations the concept of back-to-work pay as provided in the Michigan Employment Security Act (MESA).
The specific question assigned to the claim of Bania against Ford Motor Company (Ford) is:
Does the payment of vacation pay during a period of unemployment commencing with a layoff under the provisions of § 27(c)(2) of MESA have any effect upon the computation of time necessary to qualify for a back-to-work payment?
We find that the designated paid vacation period cannot be calculated in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Employment Security Commission v. Vulcan Forging Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re Estate of TranklaMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re Critchell EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- General Motors Corp. v. ErvesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Malone v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Manuel v. GillMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Federated Insurance v. Oakland County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Richmond Township v. ErbesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Grace Petroleum Corp. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. WashpunMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.