Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Worsham v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 2, 1945No. 44070Published

1ConcurrenceMaddeN, Judge

I concur in the decision of the court, and agree with its analysis of the evidence and the conclusions which it draws therefrom. I wish, however, to discuss two additional points which I regard as important.

First. I think that, in the circumstances, there would have been no breach of contract on the part of the United States even if the plaintiff had suffered from a lack of labor. Paragraph S-C 3 of the specifications is quoted in finding 3 and in the opinion of the court. It relates to the employment of union labor, which the plaintiff apparently “desired and requested.” The plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Young-Fehlhaber Pile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API