Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Reutter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1985No. C4-84-1032PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board has petitioned this court for disciplinary action against respondent Robert D. Reutter, recommending disbarment. We concur with the Board’s recommendation and disbar respondent.

On March 22, 1984, respondent was found guilty on two counts of aiding and abetting in the distribution of cocaine in Circuit Court, Second Judicial Circuit, Minnehaha County, South Dakota. Respondent was also found guilty of one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine. The convictions were for illegal conduct covering a period of almost 2 years from March 1981…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against TrygstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re FrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. In Re Reinstatement of ReutterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. OwensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Robert Andrew HUFF, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 283502Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ChaconSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API