Legal Opinion

Leslie v. Hammer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1944No. 31507PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted by the defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as plaitniffs, against the plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, to recover damages for injury alleged to have been caused to livestock and land by salt water. The claim for damages to the land was abandoned and trial was had to a jury upon the claim of damage to livestock, and resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiffs in which their recovery was assessed at the sum of $250. The defendants have perfected this appeal and as grounds for reversal urge, in substance, that the evidence is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tegeler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Reed v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. City of Seminole v. MooringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Texas Co. v. MosshamerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Atlantic Refining Co. v. FulsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. LoosenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Smith v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Marvin T. Gates, of the Estate of Fae L. Gates, Deceased, and Marvin T. Gates, Individually v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Ry. Co. v. McAnallySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. The Texas Co. v. BelvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API