Herold v. City of Austin

On Motion for Rehearing

HUGHES, Justice.

In its motion for rehearing the City of Austin has one point in which it asserts we erred because of the existence of these uncontroverted facts:

1. Appellant.is not licensed to practice architecture in Texas.

2. The compensation sought by appellant is for “proposals of mine (appellant) to revise the architectural plan for the auditorium.”

These facts are uncontroverted. If they, standing alone, preclude, as a matter of law, recovery by appellant then this motion should be granted and the judgment of the Trial Court affirmed.

It is the City’s contention that…