Legal Opinion

Hite v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 12, 1986No. 0700PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

Appellant Lester Hite initiated this action against respondent Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company seeking Eight Thousand ($8,000.00) Dollars in damages for Hartford’s alleged breach of contract. Hite now appeals the trial court’s directed verdict for Hartford. We affirm.

Because this court considers Judge Bristow’s order a clear and thorough analysis of the issue on appeal, we adopt and publish his order, as modified and supplemented, as the view of this court. The modifications and supplements are reflected by either ellipses or bracketed material.

ORDER OF JUDGE BRISTOW

____The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Kangas v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Metcalf v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. PerrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  5. Norgaard v. Nodak Mutual Insurance CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. BulaongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Michigan Mutual Insurance v. DowellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Wausau Underwriters Insurance v. HowserSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Auto World of Orangeburg, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. First SEC. Bank of Searcy v. DoeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API