Legal Opinion
Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Dowell
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 7, 1994No. Docket 145654, 145655PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.
These two consolidated cases involve a garnishment claim by Jason Dowell against his insurer, Michigan Mutual Insurance Company (mmic), seeking coverage for injuries sustained in an automobile accident, and mmic’s claim for de claratory judgment with respect to its obligation under its insurance contract with Dowell. The trial court granted summary disposition in favor of mmic, MCR 2.116(I)(2), and discharged the garnishment. Dowell appeals as of right. We affirm.
The facts are not in dispute. On September 8, 1988, Paul McKeever was driving his own automobile, a 1981 Chevrolet Chevette, in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Adkins v. Thomas Solvent Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. BulaongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Sears v. Grange Insurance Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Vanguard Insurance v. ClarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Jeffrey M. PoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- DeFLAVIIS v. LORD & TAYLOR, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Stehlik v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Pinckney Community Schools v. Continental Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- The Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Zen Design Group, Ltd., and Sun YuCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.