Legal Opinion
Smith v. Buckeye Incubator Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 27, 1940No. 50PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEVIN, District Judge.
On November 1, 1939, Samuel H. Smith, plaintiff, filed a complaint against The Buckeye Incubator Company, defendant.
On November 20, 1939, defendant, The Buckeye Incubator Company, filed a “Motion for Bill of Particulars and more definite statement”. That motion was directed to the original complaint filed, as just stated, on November 1, 1939. While this motion was still pending, undisposed of, on December 13, 1939, an amended complaint was filed against The Buckeye Incubator Company as defendant by Samuel H. Smith and The Smith Incubator Corporation as plaintiffs.
On…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. Motor Improvements, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
- Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. Motor Improvements, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1932
- Marquette Tool & Mfg. Co. v. Hooven, Owens, Rentschler Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marvel Slide Fastener Corp. v. Klozo Fastener Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Shaw v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- Hydraulic Press Mfg. Co. v. E. W. Bliss Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1941
- Coyne & Delany Co. v. G. W. Onthank Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950