Legal Opinion
Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. Motor Improvements, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 24, 1932No. 957PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIELDS, District Judge.
This is a suit in equity brought under section 4918, U. S. R. S. (35 USCA § 66), for relief against interfering patents, and for patent infringement. Plaintiff, Dooley Improvements, Ine., is an Illinois corporation. Defendant Motor Improvements, Inc., is a Delaware corporation, was served with process, and has entered a general appearance. Defendant Ernest J. Sweetland, a citizen and resident of California, was not served with process, and has not voluntarily appeared.
The biR avers that plaintiff is the owner of patent No. 1,847,817; that Sweetland, the patentee, is the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Western Electric Co. v. Pacent Reproducer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. Motor Improvements, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
- Smith v. Buckeye Incubator Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1940
- Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. NieldsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
- Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1939
- Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1991