Legal Opinion

Coyne & Delany Co. v. G. W. Onthank Co.

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided August 16, 1950No. Civ. No. 1-18Published

1Opinion of the Court

SWITZER, District Judge.

The plaintiffs filed and served a complaint charging the defendants with infringement of eight patents, one of these patents appears to be a reissue of another. It appears that in all the said eight patents include fifty-five patent claims. The complaint fails to specify with particularity whether plaintiffs contend that each and every claim under all the pending patents are infringed or whether but a part of them are so infringed. The plaintiffs’ complaint includes only a general statement or allegation as to infringement of the letters patent. Defendants, pursuant to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. National Nut Co. of California v. Kelling Nut Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945
  3. Bonney Supply Co. v. HeltzelDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1917
  4. Marvel Slide Fastener Corp. v. Klozo Fastener Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  5. Smith v. Buckeye Incubator Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API